2012-11-06

Difference Between Individual Work And Group Work

We've learned about communication and socail behavior on the Internet in last 2 lectures. And we had  activities which help us understand some theory deeply. After that, I thought more about what we learned in the class, and I'd like to share my view with others.

In this post, I will answer the questions mentioned in the class.

Answers of Activities
The answer of these two activities are shown as below (the answers are the same)
Q1. What is the definition of Social Cloud?
A1. A Social Cloud is a resource and service sharing framework utilizing relationships established between members of a social network.

Q2. What are the possible applications of a Social Cloud?
A2. A Social Computation Cloud
   A Social Storage Cloud
   A Social Collaborative Cloud
   A Social Cloud for Public Science
   An Enterprise Social Cloud

Difference In Epistemic Aims
Firstly, I want to mention about the JTB theory.
A subject S knows that a proposition P is true if and only if:
 1.P is true
 2.S believes that P is true, and
 3.S is justified in believing that P is true

In individual work, the epistemic aim is understanding the reading material,  finding out the answer of question and forming belief. In this process, our behavior reflect the second point of JTB theory: believe our answer is true.

In group work, I do think the epistemic aim changes. Since we have already understood the material and found the answer, understanding and finding out can't be regarded as our aim. In most case, we consider the answer which most people give as right. In this process, what we do is justifing whether our answer is true or not. So it reflects the third point of JTB theory: we are justified in believing our answer is true.

Difference In Epistemic Cognition
In individual work, people have no chance to communicate with others about their idea, and they might not be very sure about their answer, their idea, their view, etc. at the stage of certainty of knowing and criteria of knowing. And there are less things inspires people to generate new ideas.

However, in group work, by sharing their own ideas with others, people can find an answer more quick; by learning from others and discussing the issue with others, people can produce new knowledge more easily.

Our group changed our focus point after knowing our answers are the same. We discussed things we wanted to know and problems from the article etc..
 

Difference In Processes
I think the activities might not reflect the social behavior completely.The first reason is that in the second activity we have already find our own answer. The second reason is that the questions are very simple.

Firstly, you may notice a phenomenon that there are always few people doing nothing in a group work.(what we say "打酱油" in Chinese) So, If the article in Activity Two is different from Activity One, people mentioned above may show this character.

Secondly, as many students said, the questions are quite easy and almost everyone could affirm the answer. Students always check answers of advanced math homework during their university life. Why? Because the questions are very complicated and confirmation degree of such questions is lower than simple questions. In addition, with many controversial issue, different people hold different stand. So when questions given are complicated or controversial, the difference between  individual work and group work will be more obvious.


Reference:

10 条评论:

  1. It's fabulous that you and your groupmates can have a discussion other than that 2 questions and argue with that.
    In addition, I thought of more when you mentioned "打酱油" group members. Sometimes, those members are just lack of knowledge to make some contribution. However, in groupwork, most of the students don't like to be looked down by others, and they will try to contribute as much as they can. I think in this way, groupwork improve quality of students' work to some extent.

    回复删除
  2. As you mentioned in the blog,"JTB theory" is a new term to me.Maybe I can use it to explain some social behaviors.Your group are really collaborative to finish, or in some extent to help each other to finish the learning of knowledge.In addition, I totally agree with the opinion of the last part of your artical. the questions are quite easy and almost everyone could affirm the answer.So maybe we cannot observe the difference between individual study and group collaboration considerably.

    回复删除
  3. Actually, in class activity two, there are several divergent thinking questions and our group had discussed them already. If you have interests in them you can read my blog and discuss with me deeply. In addition to that, the phenomenon “打酱油”,the group members do nothing, which may not contribute for their team. But sometimes they might have the limit knowledge, listen to more suggestions, and hard to express themselves. They might standout in other fields we just ignore. The active attitude is most significant thing in group work.

    回复删除
  4. Thank you for introducing us the JTB theory.As mentioned in your article,when questions given are complicated or controversial, there will be much more differences between individual work and group work.I cannot agree more.When problems are quite easy to solve,everybody is able to work it out perfectly;however,when it comes to a complex issue,team work is much more effective.

    回复删除
  5. As you said, there are always few people doing nothing in a group work. So if a group wants to dig the potential power of each group member, there should be a more reasonable rule. Punish those who do few things and reword the diligent ones. I am sure that may helps the efficiency of the group working!

    回复删除
  6. i agree with your points. group members should have the same goal and work together. if someone doesn't make any contribution(dajiangyou), other members would feel unfair and complain about these JiangYou guys. And the significance of a group would be clearly shown if the complexity is relatively high. When a goal is too easy to realize, there is no meaning to work as a group, and individuals could do it by themselves.

    回复删除
  7. The essay compared individual and group works in 3 different aspects. However, I think somewhere can be explained more, such as JTB theory so that readers would be easier to understand. Also, I could not really figure out why there are some people "打酱油" if Activity 2 is different than Activity 1, while they will not if 2 activities are the same.

    回复删除
  8. I have to say that I agree with most with your article but a little question. That is "打酱油" in a group which maybe meaning the group doesn't fully utilize their members. I believe that if we have set assignment distributing details, "打酱油" will get anesis. What do you think about it? Looking for deep discussion~

    回复删除